I feel as though I am following a them criticizing some home inspectors of late. I have been placed in situations where I have evaluated other inspector’s work, and I found some odd things in their report. Over the weekend, I dealt with an unusual situation where a close relative is selling a house to a good friend of my wife. I was able to see the story unfold on both sides.
A little background: I was going to be the inspector for my wife’s friend, until she decided to purchase my relative’s house. I suggested another inspector that I know, who I felt would do a good job for them. My wife informed me that her friend was very upset with the inspector that I recommended, and that I had lied about his price and professionalism. I was dumbfounded. I could not accept that this home inspector had let them down. It turns out that they did not use the person that I had suggested. Their Realtor had set up the home inspection with a different firm, and when she found out they were mad, the Realtor told them that the inspector was the person I had suggested. (It is nice to see the Realtor taking responsibility, is it not?)
Based on the home inspector’s recommendation, the buyer submitted a list of repairs to my relative with a copy of the report. My relative called me to go over the list and the report. One section dealt with the water heater, which really puzzled my relative. Here is the statement from the home inspector on needed repairs:
Temperature & pressure relief (TPR) valve(s) (should be replaced
every three years).
o sediment trap(s) was(were) discovered on gas supply line.
supply lines not insulated for first 6 feet at unit(s).
TPR drain line was not terminating to outside or not located. It should be terminating outside to
within 6” of ground and pointing down.
TPR drain material (PVC used) –unsafe.
Why would this cause confusion to the seller? The water heater was just installed this year, and the building inspector from the city had approved the installation. From glancing at any unit, a home inspector cannot give you an exact age. With water heaters, you can use the serial number to look up the unit’s age. There were signs that the unit was relatively new, which would have made me cautious with the first statement. Replacing the TPR valve after three years is not a bad idea, but it is not mandatory. In this case, the inspector makes a rash claim, since there was a possibility that the unit was not older than three years. As for the sediment trap or insulated pipe, those are nice to have, but they are not required. The TPR drain was just outside the door of the room where the water heater is located. He did not bother to look. For the drain material, he noted that it was reduced in size and that it was improper material. The reduction he did not mention above, but the pipe was clearly not reduced. As for the material, I did find one connector that I would assume was wrong, but the plumber claims that it was just mislabelled. We are still waiting to have the plumber come out to look at it. The missing pan drain is correct, and I had mentioned it before, but my relatives felt if the building inspector had approved it that it must be fine.
The home inspector’s report contained many inaccuracies along with correct evaluations and recommendations made as issues. From the first page, we began to wonder. He stated that he arrived at the home at 8:20 am. I was there at that time, so I know that he was not. The homeowner was there later, and the inspector had not arrived. His clients waited for him at a later time, and he was not there then either. Yet his report indicates that he spent three hours inspecting the house, which would be good, but he lied about it anyway. His report seems to have been created with a list of common errors that he decided that the house must have, so good ahead and mark them down.
Most home inspectors that I know spend a good amount of effort trying to deliver the best report possible to their clients, but inspectors like this one give us all a bad name.